Altruism Essay Example for Free

Altruism EssayThe statement nation never intentionally act to well- existence others further only to deem some keen for themselves is lots described as Altruism or an altruistic act. This statement is non entirely true. It is possible for someone to intentionally act to benefit others, but this is something that does non happen very often. There be multiple theories as to why muckle do and do non perform altruistic acts. If someone is a appendage of your family you ar more likely to service a person in need, if you feel sympathetic towards someone you be likely to serve a person in need or if it is a societal average you are likely to jockstrap them. If in a certain situation component part someone is not a social norm then you are less likely to help this person. Even if someone wanted to perform an altruistic act it is very difficult to do so in our society because we reward people who we encompass to be effective, or to have done good things. If you perform an Altruistic act towards a member of your family would be acting within Hamiltons kin selection possibility (1960s). The kin selection theory which states that you are much more likely to perform an altruistic act if the person you are helping is a member of your family.An example of this is recently in Melbourne there was a wall collapse. Three people died as a result of this incident a woman in her thirties and an eighteen and nineteen-year-old siblings, the ripened brother and his babe. The older woman died upon impact, as did the brother, but only after he shielded his sister from the collapsing wall. His sister also died later in hospital. (ABC News, 1st April 2013) This is an example of the kin selection theory. Instead of doing what benefited himself, he tried to conserve his sister, despite it having dire consequences.This would be considered an act of altruism as it did not benefit him, and in this case even had negative consequences, especially as his sister later die d in hospital. another(prenominal) reason people perform altruistic acts is out of sympathy. Sympathy is a natural feeling of hit for a person. Even if you cant relate to the person you feel bad for them, or touch for them. An example of someone feeling sympathetic is Julio Diaz, who when a mugger came up to him one night with a natural language he handed oer his wallet without complaint.When the mugger went to straits away he stopped him and offered him his coat as well, saying he didnt want the mugger to get cold. He then continued to offer to subvert the mugger dinner. (Huffington Post, 17th November 2011). Diaz obviously felt sympathy towards the mugger, or he wouldnt have given everywhere his wallet, jacket and paid for his dinner. Diaz ended up getting his wallet back from the boy who handed it over after they had eaten. Diaz felt sympathy towards the boy due to the fact that the boy had al near nothing, where as Diaz had abounding money to comfortably live.Sympathy mak es people feel like they have a moral certificate of indebtedness to help someone in need the person they feel sympathetic towards. Sometimes people help others because it is considered a social norm. An example of this is saying please and give thanks you. This is considered normal in most societies and it is often frowned upon if you dont use these. A social norm is something people often take for tending(p) and a lot of people are shocked when someone doesnt follow what they consider to be normal. Another example of a social norm in our society is to wear clothes in public.If you were walking down the passageway and you say someone walking towards you naked you would not think this was normal. You would query why they were naked and often avoid walking to close to, making eye contact with, or speaking to this person. If you were in some traditional aboriginal culture you would wear nothing but puppet skin, or even walk around naked. This is/was considered a social norm wi thin that society. There are some internationally recognized social norms, like not engaging in cannibalism, and dressing modestly. era not all societies, past or present, follow these social norms most of the world does. There are also norms within society, religion and individual families. A social norm in our society is mate-ship, not letting down your friends, family, or community. There are plenty of social norms in religion, such as in Christianity it is not exactable to love someone of the same sex. This is an example of a social norm that is behind changing over time, as do most social norms.It was a social norm in Britain in the 1800s that you attended church, where as in 2002 only 18. 6% of people in the linked Kingdom attended church regularly. (Tearfund report, 2007) This is an example of how social norms change over time, and what we consider to be social norms at the moment may not be considered normal in 40,50,60,70 or more years. These things cannot be considered a n altruistic act because you would benefit poorly from not doing these things, so it is good for you to say please and thank you, bringing it back to the first example.There are also plenty of things people do not do to help others because it is considered outside of the social norms. If you saw a drunk person on the street you probably wouldnt help them because society has shaped us to think that these people brought the state they are in on themselves, therefore it is not our problem to help them once they are in this situation. cordial norms can be beneficial, but they can also detrimental. Another instance where helping someone is not considered an altruistic act is if the act is mutually beneficial.This can cover a range of things, from the benefit to you being a smile from someone, to a bravery award. If you see a child drowning and you swim out and save them and when you get back their mother says thank you and buys you an ice plane then you are benefiting, the ice cream be ing the benefit. If while trying to save this child you drown you do not benefit in anyway, and this even has a negative affect on you. This would be an act of altruism because there is no mutual benefit.A benefit for you may be something as small as a good feeling inside, or a smile, but these are benefits of saving the child, there for there is mutual benefit. You walk away with a good feeling and maybe an ice cream and the child walks away with his life. A real life example of this is Don Richie, who lived just across the road from one of Australias most notorious suicide locations. It is estimated that Richie saved more than 160 lives in his lifetime.He received the title of Australias local hero in 2011(ABC Radio, 14th May 2012). This is something he got out of stopping these people charge up suicide. Despite the fact that he had no knowledge he was going to receive this award when he started saving people, because he received this award it is not an act of altruism. Some woul d argue that even if he hadnt received this award these would still not be acts of altruism, as he felt good about saving these people, and it made him a happier person.This is his benefit, making it mutually beneficial and not an act of altruism. People do act to benefit others, without obtaining good for themselves, but this is a rare situation. Whether the person wanted to obtain some good for themselves or not they almost always do, as acts of kindness are rewarded in most societies. While people can intentionally act to benefit others without obtaining good for themselves this almost never happens, simply because of the way our society is shaped.